Feedback Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore
Feedback
menu
close

Principles, factors and ways of ensuring Ukraine’s social stability in the conditions of martial law and ...

Blyzniuk, V. V. (Ed.). (2026). Principles, factors and ways of ensuring Ukraine’s social stability in the conditions of martial law and post-war challenges. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, State Organization "Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine". Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

ISBN 978-617-14-0577-6 (electronic edition)

The authors: Blyzniuk ViktoriiaBystriakov IhorBorzenko OlenaBurlai TetianaPodliesna VasylynaShumska SvitlanaHlazova AnnaHuk LarysaKlynovyi DmytroKorzhunova Nataliia, Perehudova TetianaKhaustov Volodymyr

Year of publication: 2026
Pages: 227
ISBN 978-617-14-0577-6 (electronic edition)
Language: Ukrainian
Publisher: State Organization "Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine"
Place: Kyiv
DOI:

The monograph reveals the theoretical and methodological foundations of social stability in Ukraine and identifies key factors, mechanisms and tools for ensuring it in the conditions of martial law and post-war recovery. Social stability is studied as a multidimensional property of society, economy and state institutions to maintain viability under the influence of long-term shocks, adapt to new restrictions, restore critically important functions and carry out structural transformations.

The authors systematizes modern conceptual approaches to the study of social resilience, social cohesion and solidarity, and analyzes demographic, demo-economic and socio-humanitarian factors of the reproduction of human potential, as well as the problems of inequality, poverty, discrimination and social exclusion. Defined various modern imbalances in the social and labor sphere and in the labor market, risks of precarious employment, prerequisites for the restoration of human potential, and return and reintegration of Ukrainian citizens.

The research reveals various macrofinancial, digital, informational and spatial mechanisms of adaptation and recovery, and the role of international assistance and resource provision of social resilience. The strategic pillars of social resilience are substantiated, the importance of social quality is revealed and an integrative approach to shaping the state policy for its provision is proposed. The author formulates various strategic directions and practical recommendations for strengthening human potential, social cohesion, institutional capacity and adaptability of Ukraine’s socio-economic system in the conditions of war and post-war challenges.

 

Show more Less

References

  1. Barron, P., Cord, L., Cuesta, J., Espinoza, S. A., Larson, G., & Woolcock, M. (2025). Social sustainability and the development process: What is it, why does it matter, and how can it be enhanced? Oxford Development Studies, 53(3), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2025.2502971 
  2. Bohush, L. H. (2022). Problemy i perspektyvy povoiennoho pryskorennia sotsialno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku Ukrainy [Problems and prospects for post-war acceleration of socio-economic development of Ukraine]. Economic Bulletin of National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnical Institute", (24), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.24.2022.274806 
  3. Bove, V., Efthyvoulou, G., & Navas, A. (2017). Political cycles in public expenditure: Butter vs guns. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(3), 582–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.03.004 
  4. Caperna, G., & De Pedraza Garcia, P. (2021). JRC statistical audit of the resilience dashboards (EUR 30895 EN). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/401349 
  5. Chugunov, I. (2024). Finansovo-biudzhetna polityka yak skladova rezylientnosti derzhavnykh finansiv ta sotsialno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku krainy [Financial and budgetary policy as a component of the resilience of state finances and socio-economic development of the country]. Demography and Social Economy, 58(4), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2024.04.113 
  6. Duka, A. P., & Starchenko, H. V. (2019). Proektno-oriientovanyi pidkhid v systemi realizatsii instrumentiv zabezpechennia rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrainy [Project-oriented approach in the system of implementation of instruments for ensuring the development of Ukraine’s economy]. Efektyvna ekonomika, (11). https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2019.11.2 
  7. Duval, G. (2025, March 14). Europe’s military build-up: Will social spending be sacrificed? Social Europe. https://www.socialeurope.eu/europes-military-build-up-will-social-spending-be-sacrificed 
  8. European Commission. (2021). Building an economy that works for people: An action plan for the social economy (COM(2021) 778 final). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2767/12083 
  9. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. (2026). Resilience dashboards: Summer 2025 update [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.2905/JRC.NCNJFEG
  10. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 
  11. Giovannini, E., Benczur, P., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., & Manca, A. R. (2020). Time for transformative resilience: The COVID-19 emergency (EUR 30179 EN). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/062495 
  12. Hallegatte, S. (2014). Economic resilience: Definition and measurement. Policy Research Working Paper, (6852). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6852 
  13. Heyets, V. (2019). Social quality in a transitive society: The role of the state. International Journal of Social Quality, 9(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.3167/IJSQ.2019.090103 
  14. Heyets, V. (2024). Ekonomichna sotsializatsiia na shliakhu do solidarnoho konstruiuvannia realnosti [Economic socialization on the way to solidarity construction of reality]. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketynh – Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, (4), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2024.04.027 
  15. Heyets, V. M., Burlai, T. V., & Blyzniuk, V. V. (2023). Sotsialna rezylientnist natsionalnoi ekonomiky kriz pryzmu dosvidu Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu ta Ukrainy [Social resilience of the national economy through the prism of the experience of the European Union and Ukraine]. Ekonomìčna teorìâ  – Economic theory, (3), 5–43. https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2023.03.005 
  16. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, (4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 
  17. Hossein-Zadeh, I. (2007, July 14). Parasitic imperialism: The economics of war profiteering. Global Research. https://www.globalresearch.ca/parasitic-imperialism/6330 
  18. IASQ Board. (2024, December). Basic principles of the social quality perspective: Its configuration of four frameworks as a starting point for new global political strategies. International Association on Social Quality. https://socialquality.org/about-iasq/basic-principles-social-quality/ 
  19. Keck, M., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde, 67(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.02 
  20. Kostrytsia, V. I., & Burlai, T. V. (2025). Hlobalna otsinka ta stratehichni initsiatyvy YeS shchodo sotsialnoi spravedlyvosti: Korysne dlia povoiennoi Ukrainy [Global assessment and EU strategic initiatives on social justice: Useful for post-war Ukraine]. In Pratsia v XXI stolitti: Novitni tendentsii, sotsialnyi vymir, innovatsiinyi rozvytok [Labour in the 21st century: Latest trends, social dimension, innovative development] (pp. 199–207). National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman. 
  21. Kostrytsia, V. I., Burlai, T. V., & Blyzniuk, V. V. (2024). Deformatsii instytutu sotsialnoho dialohu v Ukraini yak chynnyk suspilnoi desolidaryzatsii [Deformations of the institution of social dialogue in Ukraine as a factor of societal desolidarization]. Ekonomìčna teorìâ  – Economic theory, (3), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2024.03.024
  22. Krecké, E. (2026, January 15). Competing models for the future of welfare in Europe. GIS Reports. https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/future-of-welfare-europe/ 
  23. Lange, G.-M., Wodon, Q., & Carey, K. (Eds.). (2018). The changing wealth of nations 2018: Building a sustainable future. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1046-6 
  24. Letzing, J. (2025, July 3). The price of security: Europe is set up for a serious challenge. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/economic-growth/europe-defence-recall-difficult-past-nato/ 
  25. Manca, A. R., Benczur, P., & Giovannini, E. (2017). Building a scientific narrative towards a more resilient EU society: Part 1: A conceptual framework (EUR 28548 EN). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/635528 
  26. McGuinn, J., Fries-Tersch, E., Jones, M., Crepaldi, C., Masso, M., Kadarik, I., Samek Lodovici, M., Drufuca, S., Gancheva, M., & Geny, B. (2020). Social sustainability: Concepts and benchmarks (PE 648.782). European Parliament, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies. https://doi.org/10.2861/679773; https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2020)648782 
  27. Modelski, G. (1995). The evolution of global politics. Journal of World-Systems Research, 1(1), 348–391. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.1995.38 
  28. Moulaert, F., & Ailenei, O. (2005). Social economy, third sector and solidarity relations: A conceptual synthesis from history to present. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2037–2053. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279794 
  29. OECD. (2023). Policy guide on legal frameworks for the social and solidarity economy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9c228f62-en 
  30. OECD. (2024). How’s life? 2024: Well-being and resilience in times of crisis. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/90ba854a-en 
  31. OECD. (2024). OECD survey on drivers of trust in public institutions – 2024 results: Building trust in a complex policy environment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9a20554b-en 
  32. Petrova, I. L., & Blyzniuk, V. V. (Eds.). (2018). Ukrainskyi rynok pratsi: Imperatyvy ta mozhlyvosti zmin [Ukrainian labour market: Imperatives and opportunities for change]. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, State Organization "Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Sciences of Ukraine". https://ief.org.ua/en/publication/monohrafii/2018/ukrainskyy-rynok-praci-imperatyvy-ta-mozhlyvosti-zmin 
  33. Pyrozhkov, S. I., Bozhok, Ye. V., & Khamitov, N. V. (2021). Natsionalna stiikist (rezylientnist) krainy: Stratehiia i taktyka vyperedzhennia hibrydnykh zahroz [National resilience of the country: Strategy and tactics of anticipation of hybrid threats]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy – Visnyk  of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (8), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2021.08.074 
  34. Sacchi, S., Buzzelli, G., & de la Porte, C. (2026). "Guns versus butter" in public opinion: The politicization of the warfare-welfare trade-off. Journal of European Public Policy, 33(4), 1199–1225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.2534663
  35. Shpyliova, Yu. B., & Ilina, M. V. (2018). Formuvannia aktyv-oriientovanoho pidkhodu do rozvytku terytorialnykh hromad [Advancing active-oriented approach to the development of territorial communities]. Biznes-navihator, (1–2(44)), 63–67. https://business-navigator.ks.ua/journals/2018/44_2_2018/12.pdf 
  36. Shumska, S., & Blyzniuk, V. (2025). Sotsialno-solidarna ekonomika: Kontseptsiia ta riznomanitnist orhanizatsiinykh form [Social and solidarity economy: Concept and diversity of organizational forms]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, (80). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-80-164 
  37. Trebesch, C., & Nishikawa, T. (2026). Europe steps up: Ukraine support after four years of war. Kiel Policy Brief, (203). Kiel Institute for the World Economy. https://www.kielinstitut.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/IfW-Publications/fis-import/dd24a73f-4270-46c5-9c40-bcc9df4f1672-KPB2023_EN.pdf
  38. Trebesch, C., Antezza, Arianna, Bushnell, K., Frank, A., Frank, P., Franz, L., Kharitonov, I., Kumar, B., Rebinskaya, E., & Schramm, S. (2023). The Ukraine Support Tracker. Kiel Working Paper, (2218). https://www.kielinstitut.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/Subject_Dossiers_Topics/Ukraine/Ukraine_Support_Tracker/Dataset_Documentation.pdf 
  39. Van der Maesen, L. J. G., & Walker, A. (Eds.). (2012). Social quality: From theory to indicators. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36109-6  
  40. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559 
  41. Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822399018 
  42. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. Allen Lane. https://search.worldcat.org/title/276648834 
  43. World Bank, Government of Ukraine, European Commission, & United Nations. (2026). Ukraine fifth rapid damage and needs assessment (RDNA5), February 2022 - December 2025. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/44369 
  44. Yanatma, S. (2026, March 14). Europe’s fertility rates keep falling: Which countries have the highest rates and biggest drops? Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/health/2026/03/14/europes-fertility-rates-keep-falling-which-countries-have-the-highest-rates-and-biggest-dr
Less