Відновлення та розвиток науково-інноваційного потенціалу України у повоєнний період

References

1. Absorptive capacity. The Oxford review. https://oxford-review.com/oxford-review-encyclopaedia-terms/encyclopaedia-absorptive-capacity/
2. Alvarez-Ayuso, I. C., Kao, Ch., & Romero-Jordán, D. (2018). Long run effect of public grants and tax credits on R&D investment: A non-stationary panel data approach. Economic Modelling, (75), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.011
3. Amiti, M., Duprez, C., Konings, J., & Van Reenen, J. (2024). FDI and superstar spillovers: Evidence from firm-to-firm transactions. Journal of International Economics, (152). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.103972 
4. Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Zeraibi, A., Shehzad, K., & Cantos-Cantos, J.M. (2021). Taxes, R&D Expenditures, and Open Innovation: Analyzing OECD Countries. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, (7), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010036
5. Bazhal, I. (2017). Implementation of the "triple helix" model in innovation ecosystem of Ukraine. Economy and Forecasting, (3), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.03.124 [in Ukrainian].
6. Belitski, M., & Sikorski, J. (2024). Three steps for universities to become entrepreneurial: a case study of entrepreneurial process and dynamic capabilities. Journal of Technology Transfer, (49), 2035–2055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10099-1 
7. Bergkvist, J.E., Moodysson, J., & Sandström, C. (2022). Third-Generation Innovation Policy: System Transformation or Reinforcing Business as Usual? In K. Wennberg, & C. Sandström (Eds), Questioning the Entrepreneurial State. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, (53), 201–217. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94273-1_11 
8. Bobukh, I. (2022). Otsinka vtrat i perspektyv rozvytku liuds'koho kapitalu iak skladovoho natsional'noho bahatstva Ukrainy vnaslidok vijs'kovoi ahresii [Assessment of losses and prospects for the development of human capital as a storehouse of national wealth in Ukraine as a result of military aggression]. In V. Yurchyshyn (Eds.), Geopolitical and geoeconomic changes, formation under the influence of Russian aggression, and the renewal of the Ukrainian city in the global space (p. 75–81). Razumkov Center. Kyiv. https://razumkov.org.ua/uploads/article/2022_TRANSFORMANS_UKR.pdf [in Ukrainian].
9. Carayannis, E. G., & Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, (13), 3445–3471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2 
10. Chang, H.J. (2011). Industrial Policy: Can We Go Beyond an Unproductive Confrontation? In J.Y. Lin, B. Pleskovic (Eds.), Lessons from East Asia and the Global Financial Crisis (p. 83–109). The World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/449991468156565199/pdf/618940PUB0East00public00BOX358355B0.pdf 
11. Chen, M.-Ch., & Li, H.-Yi. (2018). The effects and economic consequences of cutting R&D tax incentives. China Journal of Accounting Research, 11(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2018.07.003 
12. Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro, Rui, Huaichuan (2017). Barriers to absorptive capacity in emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 52(6), 727–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.06.004
13. De Lipsis, V., Deleidi, M., Mazzucato, M., & Agnolucci, P. (2022, Dec. 13). Macroeconomic Effects of Public R&D. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4301178
14. De Rassenfosse, G., Murovana, T. & Uhlbach, WH. (2023). The effects of war on Ukrainian research. Humanit Soc Sci Commun, (10), 856. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02346-x
15. Ding, J. (2024). Technology and the Rise of Great Powers: How Diffusion Shapes Economic Competition. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.12228596  
16. Docquier, Frederic, and Rapoport, Hillel. (2012). Globalization, Brain Drain, and Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(3), 681–730. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.3.681
17. Dosi, G. (2000). Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics. Selected Essays. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782541851
18. Eichengreen, Barry (2022, May 10). Shaping a Marshall Plan for Ukraine. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/shaping-marshall-plan-for-ukraine-by-barry-eichengreen-2022-05
19. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University - industry - government innovation in action. New York and London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929605
20. European Commission. (2023). European Innovation Scoreboard 2023 – Country profile Ukraine. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/rtd/eis/2023/ec_rtd_eis-country-profile-ua.pdf 
21. European Commission. (2024). The future of European competitiveness. Part A: A competitiveness strategy for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/712f7249-4800-11f0-85ba-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
22. European Commission. (2024). The future of European competitiveness. Part B: In-depth analysis and recommendations. Publications Office of the European Union. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/competitiveness/draghi-report_en
23. European Innovation Scoreboard 2023 – Methodology Report European Commission. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-07/ec_rtd_eis-2023-methodology-report.pdf
24. European Union (2023). Research, innovation, and technology policy in times of geopolitical competition. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/745596 
25. Fogel, K. (2018). Analysis of the migration of highly qualified personnel and migration policy of Ukraine. Agency of European Innovations. https://aei.org.ua/analiz-migracii-visokokvalifikovanih-kadriv-i-migracijnoi-politiki-ukraini/ [in Ukrainian].
26. Frolova, N. (2021). Tax incentives for R&D in the context of the development of fiscal space. Finance of Ukraine, (10), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.10.081 [in Ukrainian]. 
27. Gaind, N. (2022). How three Ukrainian scientists are surviving Russia's brutal war. Nature, (605), 414–416. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01272-3
28. Gama e Colombo, D., & Nogueira da Cruz, H. (2023). Impact assessment of innovation tax incentives in Brazil. Innovation & Management Review, 20(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-11-2020-0167 
29. Gonzalez Cabral, A., Appelt, S. & Hanappi T. (2021). Corporate Effectives Tax Rates for R&D: The case of expenditure-based tax incentives. OECD Taxation Working Papers, (54). https://doi.org/10.1787/ff9a104f-en
30. González Cabral, A. Bucci, M., Appelt, S., Galindo Rueda, F., Hanappi, T., & O’Reilly, P. (2023). A time series perspective on income-based tax support for R&D and innovation. OECD Taxation Working Papers, (62). https://doi.org/10.1787/dae3cd5c-en
31. González Cabral, A., Hanappi, T., Appelt, S., Galindo Rueda, F., & O’Reilly, P. (2023). Effective tax rates for R&D intangibles. OECD Taxation Working Papers, (63). https://doi.org/10.1787/191dad43-en
32. Guerrero, M., & Menter, M. (2024). Driving change in higher education: the role of dynamic capabilities in strengthening universities’ third mission. Small Business Economics, 63(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00869-4
33. Hart, D.M., Ezell, S.J., & Atkinson, R.D. (2012). Why America needs a national network for manufacturing innovation. The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. Washington. DC. https://itif.org/publications/2012/12/11/why-america-needs-national-network-manufacturing-innovation 
34. Henningsen, B, Schlaeger, J., Elmar Tenorth, H. (Eds.). (2013). Humboldt's Model: The Future of Universities in the World of Research. BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. https://www.amazon.com/Humboldts-Model-Future-Universities-Research-ebook/dp/B07FMHLGS8
35. Heyets, V. (2025). Socialization and social quality – from turbulence to laminarity. Kyiv: PH "Akademperiodyka". https://doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.535.332 [in Ukrainian].
36. Holt, J., Skali, A., & Thomson, R. (2021). The additionality of R&D tax policy: Quasi-experimental evidence. Technovation, (107). 102293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102293 
37. Juhasz, R., Lane, N., & Rodrik, D. (2024). The New Economics of Industrial Policy. Annual Review of Economics, (16), 213–242. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081023-024638 
38. Kaldor, N. (1972). The irrelevance of equilibrium economics. Economic Journal, 82(328), 1237–1255. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231304
39. Kindzerskyi, Yu. (2021). Ukraine's industrial divergence with the eu and problems of it overcoming, Ekonomika ta derzhava, (6), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2021.6.9 [in Ukrainian].
40. Kindzerskyi, Yu. (2025). Development banks for structural transformation of the economy: peculiarities of functioning in the world and possibilities of formation in Ukraine. Ekonomichnyy analiz, 35(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2025.01.022 [in Ukrainian].
41. Lin, J.Y., & Chang, H.J. (2009). Should Industrial Policy in Developing Countries Conform to Comparative Advantage or defy it? A Debate between Justin Lin and Ha-Joon Chang, Development Policy Review, 27(5), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00456.x|; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296845922_Should_Industrial_Policy_in_Developing_Countries_Conform_to_Comparative_Advantage_or_Defy_it_A_Debate_Between_Justin_Lin_and_Ha-Joon_Chang
42. Long, Y., Cai, D. (2023). Why do governments subsidize R&D-Intensive foreign direct investment? Economic Modelling, (129), 106550.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106550
43. Lunina, I.O., & Bilousova, O.S. (2018). The Instruments for Forecasting Budget Effects of the Tax Stimulation of Innovation Activities. Statistics of Ukraine, 81(2). https://doi.org/10.31767/su.2(81)2018.02.07 [in Ukrainian].
44. Lunina, I.O., Bilousova, O.S., & Nazukova, N.M. (2023). Strategic Tasks of State Support for the Post-War Development of the National Economy. Statistics of Ukraine, 102(3–4), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.31767/10.31767/su.3-4(102-103)2023.03-04.05 [in Ukrainian].
45. Marczewska, M., Weresa, M. A., & Lachowicz, M. (2024). Towards Creativity and Innovation in Universities: Study on Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, (15), 1363–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01139-6 
46. Martinelli, A., Meyer, M., & Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, (33), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9031-5  
47. Maryl, M., Jaroszewicz, M., Degtyarova, I., Polishchuk, Y., Pachocka, M. & Wnuk, M. (2022). Beyond Resilience: Professional Challenges, Preferences, and Plans of Ukrainian Researchers Abroad. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7380509
48. Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial States. Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Anthem Press. http://digamo.free.fr/mazzucato.pdf
49. McMillan, M., Rodrik, D., & Sepulveda, C. (2017). Structural change, fundamentals and growth: A framework and case studies. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8962-9214-7
50. Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and Under-Developed Regions. Gerald Duckworth & Co., Ltd. 
51. Nabatova, O.O. (2011). Social innovations: concepts, types, subjects. Publishing house "Pravo", 3(6), 58–66. https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/3901 [in Ukrainian].
52. Nicotra, M., Del Giudice, M., & Romano, M. (2021). Fulfilling university third mission: Towards an ecosystemic strategy of entrepreneurship education. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5), 1000–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896806 
53. OECD. (2021). OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/38b0fdb1-en  
54. OECD (2025). OECD Economic Surveys: Ukraine 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/940cee85-en
55. OECD/EUIPO. (2021). Misuse of E-Commerce for Trade in Counterfeits, Illicit Trade. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c04a64e-en
56. OECD/EUIPO. (2023). Risks of Illicit Trade in Counterfeits to Small and Medium-Sized Firms, IllicitTrade. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fa6d5089-en
57. Omelyanenko, V. A. (Eds.). (2022). Innovatsiini osnovy vidnovlennia ta rozvytku krain pislia zbroinykh konfliktiv: innovatsiinyi vymir [Innovative foundations for the recovery and development of countries after armed conflicts: an innovative dimension]. Institute of Innovative Development Strategies and Knowledge Transfer. Sumy. https://dspace.kntu.kr.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/35a294ee-253a-4e87-9727-213cdf12fd0e/content [in Ukrainian].
58. Perotti, Roberto (2004, December). Public Investment: Another (Different) Look. IGIER Working Paper, (277). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.637190 
59. Pidorycheva, I. (2022). Post-war recovery of Europe: experience and lessons for Ukraine. Journal of European Economy, 21(2(81), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2022.02.170 
60. Powell, J.J.W., Baker, D.P., & F. Fernandez (Eds.). (2017). The Century of Science: The Global Triumph of the Research University, (33). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3679201733
61. Research, innovation, and technology policy in times of geopolitical competition. (2023). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/745596
62. Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Jornal of Economic Growth, (21), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3
63. Rumpf, G., Strogilopoulos, J., & Yegorov I. (Eds.). (2011). Kliuchovi osoblyvosti innovatsijnoi polityky v iakosti osnovy dlia rozrobky zakhodiv spryiannia innovatsiiam, scho spriamovuiut' Ukrainu do zasnovanoi na znanniakh konkurentospromozhnoi ekonomiky - porivniannia sytuatsii v YeS i Ukraini [Key features of innovation policy as a basis for developing innovation promotion measures that guide Ukraine towards a knowledge-based competitive economy - a comparison of the situation in the EU and Ukraine]. Phoenix, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://kneu.edu.ua/userfiles/our_partners/gudrun/1_UA.pdf [in Ukrainian].
64. Saltan, A.A. (2014). Social innovations as a condition for the development of modern Ukraine. Political science, 228(216). https://politics.chdu.edu.ua/article/view/27697 [in Ukrainian].
65. Shovkun, I. (2022). Transformation of the structure of the Ukrainian economy in wartime. Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannia ekonomiky, 1(44), 133–144. http://tppe.econom.univ.kiev.ua/data/2022_44/zb44_12.pdf [in Ukrainian].
66. Shovkun, I. (2023). Rol' priamykh inozemnykh investytsij u restrukturyzatsii ekonomiky: svitovyj povoiennyj dosvid ta ukrains'kyj kontekst [The role of foreign direct investment in economic restructuring: global post-war experience and the Ukrainian context]. In V.V. Nebrat (Ed.), Reconstruction for development: foreign experience and Ukrainian perspectives (p. 335–355). NAS of Ukraine, SO "Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine". Kyiv. https://ief.org.ua/en/publication/monohrafii/2023/vidbudova-dlja-rozvytku-zarubizhnyy-dosvid-ta-ukrainski-perspektyvy [in Ukrainian].
67. Shovkun, I. (2024). Regulation of the innovation-driven progress of the economy amidst the innovation policy dismantling in Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 67(12(757), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2024.12.085 [in Ukrainian].
68. Singh, R., Yabar, H., Nozaki, N., Niraula, B., & Mizunoya T. (2017). Comparative study of linkage between environmental policy instruments and technological innovation: Case study on end-of-life vehicles technologies in Japan and EU. Waste Management, (66), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.04.035 
69. Sitnicki, M. W. (2020). The International Competitive Potential of Ukrainian Research Universities. Business Inform, (3), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-3-170-181 [in Ukrainian].
70. Sokolovska, A. (2021). Evaluation of tax benefits effectiveness for certain types of activities in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, (5), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.05.058; (6), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.06.040 [in Ukrainian]. 
71. Sokolovska, A. (2022). Implementation of the concept of tax expenditures in Ukraine: problems and ways to solve them. Finance of Ukraine, (7), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.07.032 [in Ukrainian].
72. Sokolovska, A., & Rainova, L. (2017). Tax instruments for stimulating R&D in Europe and the world: design and peculiarities of use. Finance of Ukraine, (11), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2017.11.065 [in Ukrainian].
73. Sperling, G. (2013). The case for a manufacturing renaissance. Remarks at the Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/The-Case-for-a-Manufacturing-RenaissanceGene-Sperling7252013FINALP.pdf
74. Stiglitz, J.E., Lin, J.Y., & Monga C. (2013). The Rejuvenation of Industrial Policy. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (6628), 8. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6628
75. Sysoyev, Yevgen. (2024, July). DealBook of Ukraine 2024 edition. Covering tech investment deals in Ukraine since 2014. AVentures Capital. Slideshare. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/dealbook-of-ukraine-2024-edition-report/270058911
76. Sytnytskyi, M. V. (2018). Stratehichne upravlinnia rozvytkom doslidnytskykh universytetiv [Strategic management of the development of research universities]. Lira-K Publishing House. Kyiv. https://lira-k.com.ua/preview/12571.pdf?srsltid=ARcRdnpz_eJixyOwEKNqTlZkB-fdW1cIGxHraUghuZp79R4GoDHlcmVG [in Ukrainian].
77. Tarnoff, Curt (2018, January 18). The Marshall Plan: Design, Accomplishments, and Historic Significance. Congressional Research Service. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1156806/
78. The Industrial Policy Revolution I. (2013). In E. Joseph Stiglitz and Justin Yifu Lin (Eds.), The Role of Government Beyond Ideology. Palgrave Macmillan. 
79. UNECE. (2012). Fostering Innovative Entrepreneurship: Challenges and Policy Options. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ceci/publications/fie.pdf
80. UNDPP. Global knowledge index. https://www.knowledge4all.org/country-profile?CountryId=1112
81. Venger, V.V. (Ed.). (2024). Development of Ukraine’s titanium and aluminum industry on an innovative basis: prospects and limitations. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, SO "Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine". Kyiv. https://ief.org.ua/en/publication/monohrafii/2024/rozvytok-tytanovoi-ta-aluminievoi-promyslovosti-ukrainy-na- [in Ukrainian]. 
82. Von Brasch, T., Cappelen, A., Hungnes, H., & Skjerpen, T. (2021). Modeling R&D spillovers to productivity: the effects of tax credits. Economic Modelling, (101), 105545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105545
83. WDI. The World by Income and Region. https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/the-world-by-income-and-region.html
84. Widyani, A. A. D., Suardhika, I. N., Astiti, N. P. Y., & Rustiarini, N. W. (2022). Triple Helix: the concept of synergy for SMEs to increase business performance. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 24(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.54609/reaser.v24i2.183 
85. World Bank Group. (2017). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Ecosystem Diagnostic. https://doi.org/10.1596/28831
86. World Bank Group. (2025). Ukraine rapid damage and needs assessment (RDNA4). World Bank, Government of Ukraine, European Union, United Nations. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/
    core/bitstreams/96bd9c94-c327-49b4-8aff-fe125686f04e/content
87. World Economic Forum. (2024). The Future of Growth Report 2024. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Growth_Report_2024.pdf 
88. WIPO. (2024a). Global Innovation Index 2024. GII 2024 results. https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2024/en/gii-2024-results.html#h2-innovation-across-the-world-s-regions 
89. WIPO. (2024b). Ukraine ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2024. https://www.wipo.int/gii-ranking/en/ukraine 
90. World Intellectual Property Organization and Luiss Business School (2024, June). World Intangible Investment Highlights. www.wipo.int/en/web/intangible-assets/measuring-investments
91. Yegorov, I. (2011). Evolution of Foresight studies in Ukraine: 1980s-2000s. In: G. Banse, A. Grunwald, I. Hronszky, G. Nelson (Eds.), On Prospective Technology Studies (p. 122–139). Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing. https://www.ksp.kit.edu/reader/books/pdf/10.5445/KSP/1000024155
92. Yegorov, I., & Kindzers'kyj, Yu. (Eds.) (2023). Otsinka innovatsijnoho rozvytku ta strukturni transformatsii v ekonomitsi Ukrainy [Evaluation of innovative development and structural transformations in Ukraine’s economy], National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, SO "Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine". https://ief.org.ua/en/publication/monohrafii/2023/
    ocinka-innovaciynoho-rozvytku-ta-strukturni-transformacii-v-ekonomici-ukrainy [in Ukrainian]. 
93. Zhilinska, O.I. (2014). Universytet: geneza idei ta transformatsiia diialnosti vid klasychnoi do innovatsiinoi modeli [University: genesis of the idea and transformation of activities from a classical to an innovative model]. In
    L.V. Hubersky, & A.S. Filipenko (Eds.), The Idea of the University: A Modern Discourse (p. 153–197). Kyiv: Publishing and Printing Center "Kyiv University"
    [in Ukrainian].